The dated baseline
Exactly what was asked, exactly what came back, and the date it was captured. This is the only thing that makes any later claim of improvement checkable.
Seven days, fixed fee, finite scope. A dated record of what the assistants currently say about your category, five fixes actually shipped, and a date to check again.
£400FIXED
Asking a business to sign a monthly retainer with a supplier they have never worked with is asking for a lot of trust up front. This is the smallest useful piece of work I can sell instead.
It is deliberately finite, so there is a real end point and a real document at it. If nothing about the result is convincing, that is a complete answer and no further commitment follows.
I put the questions your buyers would actually ask to ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity and Copilot, and record the answers verbatim with the date attached. Search Console and the site's index coverage are read at the same time.
The gap between what the assistants say and what is true about your business gets written down as a specific list of causes. Inconsistent company facts and unextractable page structure account for most of it, most of the time.
The five highest-leverage items from that list are actually implemented, not handed over as recommendations. What was changed and when is logged line by line.
You get the baseline, the diagnosis, the log of what shipped, and a stated date to re-ask the same questions. The re-check is what makes the whole thing measurable rather than decorative.
Exactly what was asked, exactly what came back, and the date it was captured. This is the only thing that makes any later claim of improvement checkable.
The five items with the most leverage on whether you can be cited, made live during the week. Typically entity facts, structured data, and the structure of two or three key pages.
A specific future date on which the same questions get asked again, so the before and after sit side by side. No open-ended promise of eventual results.
It is not a guarantee that any assistant will start naming you within the week. It does not pretend to control model output. It is a measurement plus the highest-value corrections that measurement reveals.
A dated document recording what each assistant said when asked for a supplier like you, a written list of the five fixes I shipped, and a stated re-check date. The fixes are made, not recommended.
Because five is what genuinely fits in seven days at this price without the work becoming shallow. Capping it keeps the promise honest rather than producing a list of thirty items that nobody ever gets through.
Then you have paid £400 to learn that, which is a legitimate outcome and considerably cheaper than a retainer that discovers the same thing in month three. I will say so plainly rather than invent work to justify the fee.
No. It is a complete, self-contained piece of work with no obligation attached to it, and plenty of people take the document and stop there.
Usually within a few working days of the scope being agreed in writing, since there is no lengthy onboarding involved. The fee is invoiced by ND Media LTD and nothing is charged automatically from an enquiry.
Tell me your website, your sector and roughly who buys from you, and I will confirm whether the Sprint is the right first step or whether something else would serve you better.
Or call 07305 523333